Tag: sea lamprey

The Ten Least Wanted: Non-Native Species in the Great Lakes

Earlier this year, when it appeared that U.S. agencies would be unable to hire a full field staff to control sea lamprey in the 2025 season, the estimated economic damage was staggering. The feared staff reduction would have led to the survival of 2.5 million invasive lamprey, which would live to consume 12.5 million pounds of fish worth $264 million.

Fortunately, federal budget cutters backed off the staff reduction, which would have axed 12 probationary employees from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the federal agency that carries out lamprey control on the U.S. side of the Great Lakes.

The continued menace of lamprey demonstrates not only the economic impact of non-native aquatic species, but also a fundamental attribute of these species: once they have entered the Great Lakes, they are usually here to stay, and require continued vigilance and control to protect the character of the Lakes. Governments spend over $25 million a year to keep lamprey from getting out of control.

The Great Lakes basin contains at least 188 documented aquatic nonindigenous species (ANS), making it one of the most heavily invaded aquatic systems in the world.

A new tool is helping researchers and program managers set priorities for protection of the biological integrity of the Great Lakes. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Michigan Sea Grant, and the University of Michigan have identified the top ten “aquatic nonindigenous species (ANS) determined to have the most significant negative environmental and socio-economic effect.”

The agencies employed a science-based method to determine the impacts of species. Criteria included their direct hazards or threats they pose to native species, alteration of predator/prey dynamics, aggressive competition with native species, and costly damage to human recreation, aesthetics, and economic activities. 

Acting Director Dr. Jesse Feyen of NOAA’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory says the agency’s experts “have long studied the impacts of current and potential invaders in the Great Lakes. Our goal is to get the message out about the significant risks they pose.”

The ten least wanted:

Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Native to Eurasia and introduced by ballast water discharge into the Great Lakes the zebra mussel causes displacement of native mollusk species, competition for food, and biofouling damage.

Quagga mussel (Dreissena bugensis). Native to areas in the Ukraine and the Ponto-Caspian Sea, quagga mussels also hitchhiked to the Great Lakes in ballast water. Like zebra mussels, quagga mussels decrease the abundance of zooplankton, reduce chlorophyll-a concentrations, increase water transparency, and accumulate pseudofeces, which can foul the environment). As the mussel waste decomposes, oxygen is consumed, pH is lowered, and toxic byproducts are produced. Biomagnification of organic pollutants can occur as pseudofeces is passed up the food chain.

Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus).  The alewife, native to the Atlantic Ocean, entered the Great Lakes through canals. The species became widespread by 1960. Alewives became so abundant that they exceeded their carrying capacity in lakes Michigan, Huron, and Ontario, resulting in massive die-offs that littered shorelines and beaches. The invasion of alewife, coupled with destruction caused by the sea lamprey, led to the extirpation of lake trout from most areas of the Great Lakes.

Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus).  Parasitic fish native to the Atlantic Ocean, sea lampreys attach to fish with their suction cup mouth, then dig their teeth into flesh for grip. Sea lampreys feed on the fish’s body fluids by secreting an enzyme that prevents blood from clotting, similar to how a leech feeds off its host. Each individual lamprey is capable of killing up to 40 pounds (more than 20 kilograms) of fish over its 12-18 month feeding period.

Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). An aggressive invader of forest lands throughout the eastern United States, stiltgrass can reduce the diversity of native species, reduce wildlife habitat, and disrupt important ecosystem functions. Stiltgrass is considered one of the most damaging invasive plant species in the United States. 

Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Grass carp feed on plants, consuming up to 90 pounds of food a day.  The fish can only digest half of the food and expel the rest, contributing to algal blooms. Grass carp can destroy weed beds used by native fish for spawning and nursery areas and damage wetland ecosystems and waterfowl habitat.

Water chestnut (Trapa natans). Water chestnut is an aquatic invasive plant native to Eurasia and Africa. It was introduced in the United States in the mid-1800s as an ornamental plant. Water chestnut colonizes shallow areas of freshwater lakes and ponds and slow-moving streams and rivers and negatively impacts aquatic ecosystems and water recreation.

Common reed (Phragmites australis australis). The non-native strain of the common reed was accidentally introduced from Europe in the late 18th or early 19th century in ship ballast. The reeds form dense stands of stems that crowd out or shade native vegetation. Phragmites turns rich habitats into monocultures devoid of the diversity needed to support a thriving ecosystem. Non-native Phragmites can alter habitats by changing marsh hydrology; decreasing salinity in brackish wetlands; changing local topography; increasing fire potential; and outcompeting plants, both above and belowground. 

Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus). Round gobies are freshwater fish that prefer brackish water conditions. They have voracious appetites and an aggressive nature which allows them to dominate over native species. Round gobies also have a competitive advantage over native species due to a well-developed sensory system that allows for enhanced water movement detection and the ability to feed in complete darkness.

White perch (Morone americana).These fish entered the lower Great Lakes in the early 1950s through the Hudson River-Erie barge canal system and spread westward. Spread by accidental inclusion in shipments for stocking inland lakes. They feed heavily on the eggs and young of important game species, and they have the potential to cause declines in native fish populations.

The most common shared negative effects were: direct hazards or threats posed to native species, alteration of predator/prey dynamics, aggressive competition with native species, and costly damage to human recreation, aesthetics, and economic activities.

The Sea Lamprey Centennial: From Ruin to Rehabilitation

Photo: Sea lamprey have a large oral disk filled with sharp, horn-shaped teeth that surround a toothed tongue.


Many Great Lakes invasions of non-native species begin unnoticed—but not so with one of the most destructive invasions of all, the attack of the sea lamprey.

Fish with sea lamprey attached

The scourge of the Great Lakes fishery, the lamprey is believed to have appeared in Lake Ontario for some time, but was temporarily restrained by Niagara Falls from reaching the other Great Lakes. But after improvements to the Welland Canal, which bypasses the Falls, on November 8, 1921, just over a century ago, an Ontario commercial fisherman trolling in central Lake Erie noticed a lamprey much larger than the native, non-destructive lampreys that he occasionally netted. The University of Toronto identified it as a sea lamprey, and the invasive species’ war on the Great Lakes fishery was on.

“Throughout the next two decades, sea lampreys spread, unchallenged, throughout Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior,” the Great Lakes Fishery Commission says, “wantonly killing hundreds of millions of pounds of fish along the way.”

“Throughout the next two decades, sea lampreys spread, unchallenged, throughout Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior,” the Great Lakes Fishery Commission says, “wantonly killing hundreds of millions of pounds of fish along the way.”   

Looking like something out of a horror movie, sea lamprey have remained largely unchanged for more than 340 million years. Sea lamprey have a cartilaginous skeleton and a large oral disk filled with sharp, horn-shaped teeth that surround a toothed tongue. The oral disk allows them to attach to, and the toothed tongue allows them to rasp a hole into the side of, a host fish and feed on its blood and other body fluids.  Each lamprey can kill up to 40 pounds of fish over its 12-18 month feeding period.

Only one in seven Great Lakes fish survived lamprey attacks, and 85% of fish that survived had scars signaling they had been attacked.  Before the lamprey invaded, anglers harvested about 15 million pounds of lake trout in the upper Great Lakes each year. By the early 1960s, the catch had dropped to approximately 300,000 pounds, about 2% of the previous average.

Calling the lamprey invasion “arguably one of the worst ecological disasters in history,” the Great Lakes Fishery Commission has a more positive view of the response to the invasion by Canada and the United States.

The establishment of the Fishery Commission itself was part of the response, created by the two nations in 1955 to find an answer to the lamprey invasion. In a remarkable feat of research, scientists tested thousands of chemical compounds, looking for one that would primarily target lamprey, until they discovered the lampricide TFM. “It’s easy to kill fish but hard to kill just what you’re after,” says Marc Gaden, communications director for the Fishery Commission.

Sea lamprey populations are down by 90-95% from their historical highs in most areas of the Great Lakes, “certainly beyond the wildest expectations of those who established the program in 1954.” Gaden says. Barriers and dams also control sea lamprey.

To maintain the success in controlling sea lamprey, the Canadian and U.S. governments spend over $20 million a year on lampricide treatments and other control measures—and will probably have to continue control efforts in perpetuity. The rule with Great Lakes invasive species is that once they’re here, they’re here to stay, although with some species you can knock down their populations to manageable numbers.

“Sea lampreys—just like zebra mussels—are major ecosystem disruptors,” says Cory Brant, author of Great Lakes Sea Lamprey: The 70-Year War on a Biological Invader. “If we let up, they will make a comeback and feed on any large-bodied fish they can find, including lake trout, Chinook salmon, and the endangered sturgeon.”

“Sea lampreys—just like zebra mussels—are major ecosystem disruptors,” says Cory Brant, author of Great Lakes Sea Lamprey: The 70-Year War on a Biological Invader. “If we let up, they will make a comeback and feed on any large-bodied fish they can find, including lake trout, Chinook salmon, and the endangered sturgeon.”

Gaden remains optimistic. “The annual appropriation is a small, small fraction of the $7 billion Great Lakes fishery, and it’s good that elected officials see the clear connection between low lamprey numbers and the valuable fishery, leading to bipartisan support for the Commission’s lamprey control work.”

And there are promising new lamprey control approaches. Says Gaden: “We are on the cusp of using pheromones and repellents in the field as control techniques. Our scientists are honing in on concentrations needed to affect behavior.” The Fishery Commission also is beginning to explore genetics as a control technique.